ldragoon ([info]ldragoon) wrote,
@ 2007-03-04 19:34:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:empowerment fund, friends of lulu, ronee bourgeois

Forthcoming Friends of Lulu Press Release
OK, here's the skinny. We have a press release that is simply waiting for the remainder of the board to sign off on it, and will probably be released over the next couple of days. I have permission to give a mini-update, so here we go!

Basically, I spent (and I DO NOT exaggerate) about 6 hours crawling over the internet looking for the refund offer that Ronee had assured the board members that she had posted, way back when. I can't find anything. So, Shannon and I discussed it, and what we've decided to do is give all fund contributors full refunds. We contacted PayPal and, according to the customer service representative we spoke with, these refunds should go through over the next couple of days. If you contributed to the fund, and you do not receive your refund after about a week, please contact either myself (you can post here or grab my email off my Profile page) or the board at: board [AT] friends-lulu [DOT] org. I will be following up with PayPal either way to make sure things are progressing the way they told me things would.

This also leads into something else I wanted to talk about. I feel (only my opinion and I could be wrong) that a lot (though not all) of the rancor leveled against Friends of Lulu is based on the fact that Ronee's name has become inextricably linked to the Empowerment Fund. There is also the bad timing to add into the mix: the board doing it's regular turn-over in the Fall, the fact that Ronee took off and refuses to respond to emails from myself and other board members, the amount of time it took us to prepare and begin making statements, etc). I still think that a lot of it goes back to the piss-poor way Ronee conducted both herself and everything related to this fund.

Ronee has victimized a lot of people, something which is becoming very apparent to me now as I uncover more and more information, and I would like to point out that, at the end of the day, I and the other board members were her victims, too. Ronee misrepresented everything relating to the Empowerment Fund to us from the first step onward, announced the Fund without our permission and, as soon as she had achieved the notoriety she felt she deserved, dumped the whole thing in our laps and took off, leaving us to poke through everything and try to piece together shards of disparate information.

I know that Johanna of ComicsWorthReading mentioned recently that she has contacted Ronee for a statement and is waiting for a response. I hope other reporters follow this trend, and I hope Ronee does say SOMETHING. I think she has a lot to answer for.



(Post a new comment)


[info]divalea
2007-03-05 04:35 am UTC (link)
Dude. Re-posted.

(Reply to this)


[info]arcana_j
2007-03-05 05:43 am UTC (link)
I re-posted it too.

(Reply to this)


[info]kadymae
2007-03-05 10:02 am UTC (link)
I hope other reporters follow this trend, and I hope Ronee does say SOMETHING.

Let's see, if memory serves, Lisa Jonte, Lea Hernandez, Heidi MacDonald, Johanna Draper-Carlson and I were the mean girls who were trying to cut her down when we asked a few hard questions, tried to point out the lack of journalistic ethics in her inital reporting on the matter, and observed that her loose canon behavior was putting the FOL in a bad place.

She never named us by name, but I recall several references to women who live to cut their sisters down, etc.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kadymae
2007-03-05 10:08 am UTC (link)
PS. Reposted.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-05 04:40 pm UTC (link)
Yes, but I believe that the majority of these people did NOT try to contact Ronee directly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]arcana_j
2007-03-06 03:16 pm UTC (link)
"Let's see, if memory serves, Lisa Jonte, Lea Hernandez, Heidi MacDonald, Johanna Draper-Carlson and I were the mean girls ..."

Yes, I think that's right. Mean girls! I like that!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]elaynetoo
2007-03-05 02:37 pm UTC (link)
Not reposting, although I may have something up on ComicMix about this. Still vascillating; my experiences with Friends of Lulu tend to color my objectivity on this subject. :)

If Ronee answers at all she will probably do so in her own forum on Mike Netzer's website.

I still think the idea of an Empowerment Fund (as well as the idea of Friends of Lulu in general) is a sound one, but the execution was ill-thought-out to say the least. A fund like this should never be tied to one specific incident, but should be formed to address a recurring problem (or series of problems) in the industry. And of course any 501(c)3 corporation that wants to remain incorporated has to stay within its charter and guidelines and mandates, which as I recall did preclude legal work but certainly don't preclude raising awareness of issues -- a particular FoL strength.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-05 04:42 pm UTC (link)
I definitely agree, and that WAS the way the board wanted things to go -- until Ronee ran out and announced everything. At this point, I think personally that all the drama has tainted the concept, at least for FOL.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-05 04:45 pm UTC (link)
P.S. - please don't feel like you have to cross-post! If people want to, that's fine, but I don't expect them to.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tommyraiko
2007-03-06 02:26 am UTC (link)
Particularly as I'm one of most recent participants in the lively discussion over on the other comments thread, I just wanted to drop in here and again thank you for keeping folks informed and keeping on top of the official FOL response.

--T.R.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-06 03:54 am UTC (link)
Thanks so much for the encouragement! Again, if you know anyone with additional questions or concerns, direct them over here -- I would be happy to answer them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ringwoodcomics
2007-03-06 10:13 pm UTC (link)
So you know, Ronee has made a "public response" to the FoL situation. The classy thing for her to do would have been to respond in private rather than make a spectacle of things, but, y'know. Not terribly surprising.

I don't know how to do HTML codes, so here's the URL:

http://www.michaelnetzer.com/wagw/

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-07 12:36 am UTC (link)
Thank you for the head's up -- I do appreciate it. I glanced it over, and it seems like she's putting her own spin on it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadymae
2007-03-07 01:22 am UTC (link)
And that's putting it mildly. None of this mess is her fault, it seems.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ldragoon
2007-03-07 04:13 am UTC (link)
Well, I can't say I'm surprised, unfortunately.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Not every woman in comics is a sister
[info]gngrmyrsn
2007-03-07 04:21 am UTC (link)
Ronee is the Judy Miller of comics blogging.

But going forward, how can we/you/them/anyone stop the next Ronee-like creature from starting a witch-hunt, damaging the credibility of a small-but-worthy non-profit, and shifting the blame to others? Just wondering. I have one small suggestion for the future: listen to the doubters, they're not all nay-sayers and might see things the inner circle has overlooked. As Sanjuro says: "The spectator sees more than the performer." In fact, they're doing you a favor picking your idea apart. People pay money for that. If your idea still holds water after the pick-apart then do it. Grrrrr.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Not every woman in comics is a sister
[info]ldragoon
2007-03-07 07:33 am UTC (link)
Yes, I definitely agree. I don't want to speak for the other board members, but I know that I became pretty disenchanted with Ronee's handling of the project fairly early on, and she actually smacked me down pretty aggressively when I began asking some fairly standard questions. She had to be pulled into line by another board member, as I was new last year and didn't feel I had the seniority to complain.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Not every woman in comics is a sister
(Anonymous)
2007-03-08 10:48 pm UTC (link)
Yeah... okay. Lookit, here's the deal. I've known Ronee a good deal longer than any of you guys have it seems. And I'd like to know just, exactly, who she's "victimizing"? 1) She contributed to the fund, herself, and 2)... well, no, that's pretty much it. If she's putting money into a fund, then wow, she sure is hurting a LOT of people.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Not every woman in comics is a sister
[info]ldragoon
2007-03-09 12:17 am UTC (link)
To set the record straight, when I first met Ronee, I had absolutely zero opinion of her, good or bad. I am afraid to say that while I'm sure she is a good person to hang out with in real life, I was less than impressed with the experience of working with her. As to who she victimized, I'm think you should ask Ronee about that. The person involved will be releasing their own statement. Frankly, I am moving on and I will not be engaging in any more dialogue regarding Ronee.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…