Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

James Berardinelli Made Me *Head-Desk*

  • May. 13th, 2009 at 1:35 PM
Regular Self Portrait
I've been reading James Berardinelli's movie reviews for about 7 or 8 years now. Maybe longer -- I'm pretty sure I was reading his reviews when I was still back in Philly. There are some things I disagree with him about (he still thinks that Star Wars: The Phantom Menace was a good movie -- WTF??? :P ), but most of the time I find his reviews even-handed and insightful. He's no Roger Ebert, but he's usually pretty good. So I gotta wonder what the fuck he was thinking when he wrote this in his review of Management, the Jennifer Aniston/Steve Zahn Stalkers Are All Really Just Cute Misunderstood Guys And You Should Totally Go Out With Yours movie.

One might not think a creepy stalker movie would work well as a romantic comedy, but Mike is obviously harmless and Sue brings his increased attention on herself by first inviting him to "touch her butt," then compounding the error by having sex with him. One can forgive the guy for getting the wrong idea. [emphasis mine]

She shoulda known better, guise!!! SHE SHOULDA KNOWN!!! Remember: stalking is NEVER the stalker's fault! :P

Keep it classy, James.

Comments

( 39 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]cebuscapucinus wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 08:49 pm (UTC)
"Mike is obviously harmless"

Whenever I read things like this all I can think of is "Wow, it must be nice to be a man sometimes."

:P
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 08:50 pm (UTC)
Yeah, because we both know the rapists and stalkers walk around with nice big labels stapled right onto their foreheads identifying them as such. :P

Edited at 2009-05-13 09:24 pm (UTC)
[info]troubleinchina wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:53 am (UTC)
Yes, this.
[info]joamette wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:10 pm (UTC)
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:12 pm (UTC)
O. M. G.

That is the cutest, bestest, most awesomest thing EVER. @_@
[info]joamette wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:25 pm (UTC)
Told ya. :D
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:28 pm (UTC)
*bows before Joey, bringer of the awesome and the sparkley*

Oh no, wait...

*BOWS BEFORE JOEY, BRINGER OF THE AWESOME AND THE SPARKLEY*
[info]joamette wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:35 pm (UTC)
LOL.

I do what I can. :3
[info]violetjimjams wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 11:30 pm (UTC)
*le gasp*

I may have to get one.

...a Science Officer pony.

Or maybe a Horror Pony.
[info]joamette wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:33 am (UTC)
Here's another artist devoted to customizing MLPs. :)

http://mlpmeadows.deviantart.com/gallery/

[info]mothwentbad wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:42 pm (UTC)
BUT IT'S A ROMANTIC COMEDY U GUYZ!!!
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:45 pm (UTC)
OMG, I KNOW! AND I'M TOTES A HUMORLISS FEMINAZI FOR CRITICIZING IT!! WHERE OH WHERE IS MAH SENSE OF HUMUORZ?//?/???/?//
[info]mothwentbad wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:47 pm (UTC)
OF COURSE IT'S NOT REALLY LIKE THAT! IT'S A FANTASY! GOSH, DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN LUV?!? I WANT TO FEEL GOOOOOD WHEN I GO TO MOOOVEEEZ111
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:49 pm (UTC)
I KNOW -- THINKIN'S TEH HARD LOLZ!!! MAI BRAINMASS GETZ TIRED BY THE END OF THE DAY1!!!

Edited at 2009-05-13 09:50 pm (UTC)
[info]mothwentbad wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 10:37 pm (UTC)
I WISH MY STALKERZ WOULD JUMP DOWN IN A PARACHUTE LIKE THAT! NOT MY ACTUAL STALKERZ, BUT A PRETEND ONE WHO'S SORTA CUTE LIKE STEVE ZAHN! NO THIS ISN'T FILLING THE POPULAR DISCOURSE WITH WEIRD CREEPY MESSAGES!

ROMANTIC! COMEDEE!
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:19 am (UTC)
AND LIK OMG THAT'S JUST LIK TWILITE N EDWARD WATCHING BELLA SLEEP N TELLING HER WUT 2 DO N WHO SHE CAN SPEND TIME WITH. HE MUST LUV HER IF HE WANTS TO CONTROL HER, RITE?
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:47 am (UTC)
U SHUT UP, THAT'S TOTALLY ROMANTIC, LIK, OMG, I WISH EDWARD WOOD COME WATCH ME SLEEP AT NITE!!!
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:05 am (UTC)
I'll be sure to let him know the next time I see him, 'kay? ;D
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:11 am (UTC)
YAY!!!
[info]upstart_crow wrote:
May. 19th, 2009 06:35 am (UTC)
HEY WAIT A MINUTE HERE YOUNG LADY I DON'T LIKE YOUR TONE. CAN'T YOU BE NICER TO MEN LIKE THIS REVIEWER BECAUSE MAYBE IF YOU WERE THEN MEN WOULD TAKE US SERIOUSLY IT'S HUMORLESS BRA-BURNING FEMINISTS LIKE YOU THAT MAKE WOMEN LIKE ME LOOK BAD AFTER ALL!
[info]mothwentbad wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:00 am (UTC)
TOADALLY
[info]silveradept wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 09:55 pm (UTC)
Right. Because stalkers are never at fault for their obsessive behavior. Clearly, she started it and then kept leading him on, probably long after she told him to go away and never see her again and he ignored her.
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:44 am (UTC)
Silly! It's ALWAYS the victim's fault! TEE HEE.
[info]napoleana wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 12:10 am (UTC)
Because never before has someone (male or female) had a crush on a person (male or female), that someone seem totally "harmless," so that person flirts with them and maybe has one night stand with them, and then it turns out that someone is a total psycho who thinks these cues means they should be together forever. Being stalked ISN'T fun, even if it never escalates to threating letters and dead animals, it's still scary and increadibly invasive.
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:30 am (UTC)
IRL, you have no way of knowing if someone who pulls what Mike does in the movie is harmless or if you should just go into hiding now and save yourself the trouble and terror of waiting until after he's escalated to breaking into your house and waiting for you in your bedroom, sent letters about how if he can't have you no one will, and generally made it so you don't feel safe anywhere but inside a triple-locked room made of ten layers of titanium and there are huge, muscled guards with semi-automatics stationed around the entire perimeter (and then you still look under everything to make sure you're alone). It turned out to be a non-issue, but years ago when I got back from a short summer trip with my parents, there was a red silk rose and a note written in red waiting for me on the porch and the note expressed affection and devotion. O.O 'Freaked out' isn't strong enough to express how I felt. When I told my BFF about it, she fessed up to doing it and then apologized profusely. We were both nuts about Phantom of the Opera and thought a secret admirer was sooooo romantic and all that and she thought I'd like it. I wonder how many of the Twihards who sigh over how romantic Edward is would be saying the same thing if they found out a classmate was outside their window at night and following them when they went places with friends and whatever else freaky Eddiekins does to Bella. xp
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:45 am (UTC)
IRL, you have no way of knowing if someone who pulls what Mike does in the movie is harmless or if you should just go into hiding now

EXACTLY. I read a report a few years ago that went into the mentality of stalkers. There are a lot of stalkers out there who stalk people who NEVER KNOW THEY ARE BEING STALKED. These stalkers stalk people, get obsessed with them, and then move on to someone else, often without their target ever being aware they're being stalked. NOW THAT'S FUCKING CREEPY TO THINK ABOUT.
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:01 am (UTC)
If someone were stalking me, I'd much rather it were one of those people. Ignorance can be bliss.
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:10 am (UTC)
Unless they snap and decide to upgrade the type of stalker they are. @_o

Man, I wish I could find that document. Now I'm freaking myself all out. I ran into this guy last year on the train who totally gave me "stalker" vibes and I'm soooo happy I haven't seen him since. Word to the wise, guise -- no one EVER wants to hear, "You're really a NICE PERSON, aren't you?" with that weird ass inflection stuck on, which the written word cannot adequately BEGIN to describe.
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:23 am (UTC)
I'd rather not have a stalker at all, period, but I'd take the one I never know about over the one who decides to let me know Every Breath You Take is their idea of a love song.
[info]napoleana wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:30 pm (UTC)
*Nodnod* Recently, my bestfriend's boyfriend had trouble with a girl he had slept with shortly before becoming her boyfriend (which sounds skanky, but the dating did start pretty spontaneously). Now, my friend and I totally believe she must have been stalking him, because he hadn't seen head or tail of her until, rather conveniently, he was so sick he wasn't thinking right.

So anyway, the BF is the kind of dude that can be absolutely out of senses sick and still walk his ass to campus and go to class. He arrives really early and decides to take a nap on a bench outside. He wakes up to his Ex-Lover ("EL") NUZZLING HIS ARM. Being both sleepy and badly sick, he's just kind of "lolwut?" and she says she's been thinking about him, misses him, and fully intends to steal him from his GirlFriend ("GF") -- (Which by the way, is a statement I LOATHE. It's NOT up to YOU who your ex is with; DEAL with it.) He's kind of just "um, okay, I'm going to go inside now," and thinks nothing of it. Obviously, if she intends to take him from his GF, but he has no intention of leaving his GF, there isn't a problem, right? (>.<)

So after class, he's so sick he's doing everything in his power to keep from puking on the lawn, apparently visably so. EL pops up again and says "Hey, come to my dorm with me so at least you can puke in the toilet." He goes. He pukes his guts out. They talk for an hour. She tells him how much of a good idea it is for her to drive him home. (NOW SHE KNOWS WHERE HE LIVES.)

He gets home, and he has left his phone at EL's dorm (he forgets it everywhere), so he gets online and tells GF about everything that happened. GF freaks out. GF tells me, I'm like "yeah, that's totally freak-out worthy." GF doesn't want to be the girl that says who her BF can and cannot hangout with, and does a lot of debating with him about it, and finally decides that this chick makes her worry about his safety and well-being and decides that she really wants him to say toodles to EL. Since EL isn't a highly valued friend, BF says okay, whatever.

A couple hours later, there's a knock at his door and it's EL with his phone. She says she's sorry she didn't notice it earlier, but whenever it vibrated, she and her roommate "thought someone left the vibrator on." (GF & I agree: Few people are accidentally going to leave a vibe on, and even then, when they realize it, NO ONE is just going to let it keep running for 2 hours. The ONLY reason she said that was to make him think about having sex with her.) He thanks her but then tells her that the way she's been acting has his GF uncomfortable and he's not going to hang out with her anymore, and pretty much shuts the door on her.

For a couple days, nothing happens, he never sees her, and he's feeling better. THEN he gets a call while he's in class and lets it go to voicemail. After class, he checks his voicemail, and there's a message from her totally BAWLING with vague statements about how something totally wretchedly horrible has happened and she needs him NOW. Thinking some family member of hers is DEAD, he rushes to her dorm room. Knocks on the door. She answers, completely emotionally FINE, and TOTALLY NAKED. He's pretty much, "fuck no!" and leaves, and she chases him down the hall, still naked, screaming her head off at him.

"Harmless" my ASS. Now, I hang around a lot of geeks. I work for a convention (2 cons now) and was a anime club's princess (token girl) for a while. Some people come off as creepy who aren't -- they're just unsocialized. But as soon as they give you unwanted physical contact or tell you what their unwelcomed intentions are, you GET YOUR ASS OUT OF THERE. The GF & I are still worried that she's going to pop up again and do something horrible to him. :(

The one last thing that drives me crazy about this whole thing, is that I know from high school that if I guy does it, MOST other guys will be like "WTF is wrong with you?" If a chick does it, this is a totally acceptable way to "get your man" (ESPECIALLY if he's dating someone else), and is totally encouraged by many of the other girls. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the EL's roomie knew about this and encouraged everything.

Edited at 2009-05-14 02:35 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous) wrote:
May. 15th, 2009 12:19 am (UTC)
The ex is a total headcase who needs to be hit upside the head with a restraining order. The mental picture of her running down the hall after him starkers, screaming for him not to go and she'll love him forever, made me laugh.

There is a definite difference between crazy and unsocialized. Geeks tend to be less hazardous to your health, for one. ;)
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:16 am (UTC)
I read his review and all I have to say is "YES, YOU CAN BLAME MIKE, YOU STUPID MORON!" The only mistake Sue made was in not realizing when he showed up with wine and champagne the best course of action would be to politely refuse, and banging a guy you hardly know has always seemed a bit slutty to me, but that's just me. Her responsibility/liability begins and ends with giving him the idea she's interested in him. What he does after that is totally and completely HIS decision. Normal guys get a phone number or email to stay in touch with the woman after she leaves. If she does not leave that information, normal guys are disappointed but manage to move on. Normal guys do not fly across the country and show up at her place of work without telling her first--that's what men who are not "harmless" do. If a normal guy were that hung up on a woman he'd want to fly across the country right away, he'd contact her and ask when she's free to go get some dinner and drinks, etc.

Forcing yourself, be it sexually or showing up where she works and demanding her time and company, on a woman is never right and never her fault. I don't care if she was all over you like white on rice last night at the club and practically dragged you out outside so you two could get it on behind the dumpster, unless she indicates she wants to see/talk to you again, you do not a) show up at her house or at one of her friend's houses, b) call her and ask her to reconsider, or c) do anything other than take 'no' for an answer.

I just had a thought: if the genders were reversed and it were Maria the motel manager and Sam who was in town for business, would Mr. Idiot reviewing the movie consider *her* harmless? Would he say it's Sam's fault she did that because he sent the wrong message when they got it on?
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:43 am (UTC)
Exactly! Normal people DON'T STALK OTHER PEOPLE.

I just had a thought: if the genders were reversed and it were Maria the motel manager and Sam who was in town for business, would Mr. Idiot reviewing the movie consider *her* harmless?

Well, duh!!! Only a DIRTY WHOREY SLUT would do show up with flowers and champagne! Mike should just lay down and let her have sex all over him, because what self-respecting man would turn down SEX???? Like, EVER???*

*that paragraph is slathered with about six inches of sarcasm ice cream and topped with a sarcasm cherry.

Edited at 2009-05-14 02:44 am (UTC)
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:52 am (UTC)
He'd be a gentleman and humor her for dinner and then try to let her down gently, but since this movie is a guy going after a woman, clearly she owes it to him to do dinner and drinks and a screw because, hey, she banged him before so he's not at all out of line for thinking she'd want to bang again, no question.
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 02:56 am (UTC)
Hey, didn't you get the memo? Women's bodies are community property. If you show a man the slightest amount of attention that means he's entitled to you for as long as HE wants. Sheesh -- I thought EVERYONE got the memo.*

*more sarcasm ice-cream.

Mmmm...ice cream. I have some really fabulous soy ice cream w/strawberries in the freezer....
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:19 am (UTC)
We've come so far, and yet have so very far to go...I think I'll hit the freezer for some vanilla. There's toffee I can put on it--and don't forget the sprinkles!
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:20 am (UTC)
Tooooffeeeee....mmmmm... I'm digging into my "SO DELICIOUS" right now. It used to be SOY Delicious, but I guess they're trying to "appeal to a wider market". :P Good stuff though -- that Rice Dream ice cream tastes like crappy crap crap.
[info]hoppytoad79 wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:27 am (UTC)
Appeal to a wider market. *snickers* Riiiiiiiight. Until they can make soy ice cream taste like regular ice cream and they stop selling the soy in the natural foods section, the "wider market" will continue to pass it by, the same way Sci-Fi Channel changing its name to Sy-Fi isn't going to appeal to those who see sci-fi as the domain of Star Trek geeks in costume who live in their parents' basement and have no lives.
[info]ldragoon wrote:
May. 14th, 2009 03:31 am (UTC)
Tell me about it! I laughed when I realized what they were doing.

Just for the record, the So Delicious is the best soy ice cream I've ever had -- it's creamy and delicious and they make some fabulous flavors. If you have any vegan/lactose intolerant friends, I'd definitely point them its way. :)

This are two of my favorite flavors:

Tiger Chai

Mocha Almond Fudge

Gordon and I are really lucky -- we live close to a Bargain Close Out store that gets in lots of Turtle Mountain ice creams from time to time. I don't think I could justify the cost otherwise. At least not as often as we get the marked down stuff. We're kind of at the mercy of whatever flavor they get in stock, but they tend to vary it often enough we don't get too bored. And I'm hardly one to complain when it's half the price it would be at Whole Foods! :)

Edited at 2009-05-14 03:33 am (UTC)
( 39 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Regular Self Portrait
[info]ldragoon
ldragoon

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Taylor Savvy